Parental engagement is a cornerstone of student success, influencing academic, social, and emotional development. However, bilingual families frequently face systemic barriers, including linguistic, cultural, and structural challenges, that limit their full participation in their children’s education. These barriers not only hinder the potential contributions of bilingual families but also prevent schools from tapping into a rich reservoir of cultural and social capital. By integrating social capital theory, culturally responsive practices, and collaborative frameworks, educators can create equitable systems that amplify parent voices and transform traditional engagement models into meaningful partnerships (Platt, 2012; Yosso, 2005). This paper explores these intersections and offers actionable strategies for co-creating inclusive educational experiences with bilingual families.
Reframing Parental Engagement
Traditional models of parental involvement often focus on school-centric activities, such as attending parent-teacher conferences, volunteering at school events, or participating in PTO meetings. These approaches position parents as supporters of school initiatives rather than collaborators in the educational process. They frequently assume that all families have equal access to time, resources, and cultural familiarity with school expectations, unintentionally excluding bilingual families and other marginalized groups.
Conversely, contemporary engagement models emphasize a partnership-driven approach, where parents and educators share responsibility for the educational outcomes of children. These models recognize and leverage the unique cultural, social, and linguistic assets that families contribute. For example, bilingual families may enhance education by fostering cultural identity through home-based learning activities or organizing community study groups (McKenna & Millen, 2013). The focus shifts from parents as passive participants to active collaborators in co-creating educational strategies and decision-making processes.
McKenna and Millen’s “parent voice and presence” concept reframes engagement as a reciprocal partnership. Parent voice involves families expressing their concerns, aspirations, and ideas, while parent presence encompasses formal and informal opportunities for shared responsibility in educational decision-making (Cyr et al., 2022). This co-constructed process challenges traditional top-down engagement models, fostering equitable and sustainable partnerships (Epstein et al., 2018).
Leveraging Social Capital in Schools
As defined by Bourdieu, social capital refers to the networks and relationships that enable individuals to achieve collective benefits (Bourdieu, 2018). In resource-limited schools, social capital can be leveraged through intentional strategies that foster networks of trust and shared purpose among educators, families, and the broader community. These efforts can include structured initiatives such as collaborative committees, peer mentoring programs, and joint school-community projects, especially when leadership prioritizes inclusivity (Behtoui & Strömberg, 2020).
Schools can cultivate bonding social capital—strengthening ties within specific groups—by organizing regular parent gatherings, creating affinity groups for families with similar linguistic or cultural backgrounds, and hosting community-building events. Bridging social capital—connecting families to external resources and opportunities—can be achieved by partnering with local organizations to provide resources such as legal aid, language classes, and job training. Leadership should seize specific moments, such as parent-teacher meetings or cultural celebrations, to introduce these programs and encourage wide participation. These interconnected efforts enable bilingual families to navigate institutional challenges effectively and advocate for meaningful change within and beyond the school (Bourke, 2023; Gross et al., 2020).
Implementing Culturally Responsive Practices
Culturally responsive education integrates school practices with students’ and their families’ cultural values, languages, and experiences. This approach acknowledges that schools often operate within frameworks that marginalize bilingual families. Bazron et al. (2005) emphasize that implementing culturally relevant curricula, such as incorporating students’ cultural histories and bilingual texts into classroom instruction, can effectively bridge these divides.
For instance, dual-language programs that prioritize both English and the native languages of bilingual families not only improve academic outcomes but also affirm students’ cultural identity. Family-led workshops focusing on navigating school systems, sharing cultural traditions, and collaborative goal-setting create spaces where families feel empowered and valued as equal partners in their children’s education (Spear et al., 2022). Educators must participate in professional development programs focused on cultural competency, including training on implicit bias, linguistic diversity, and strategies for integrating culturally relevant pedagogy. This training should include hands-on activities, such as role-playing scenarios with bilingual families, and ongoing mentorship to ensure the sustainable application of these practices. By leveraging the strengths of diverse families, educators shift from a deficit-based perspective to one that values and incorporates family contributions into the educational process (Yosso, 2005).
Addressing Barriers to Engagement
Bilingual families face a multitude of structural barriers that impede meaningful engagement. Language differences, for instance, often prevent families from fully participating in school events or understanding key educational policies. Economic constraints, such as inflexible work hours or lack of transportation, further limit their ability to attend meetings or engage with educators (Platt, 2012). Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach. Schools must ensure that translation services extend beyond written materials to include live interpretation during conferences, workshops, and community events. Flexible meeting schedules, such as evening or weekend sessions, can accommodate working parents. Additionally, culturally aligned communication practices can strengthen connections between schools and families, such as utilizing trusted community liaisons or bilingual parent advocates.
Leadership plays a pivotal role in addressing these barriers by fostering environments of trust and collaboration. Beausaert et al. (2023) highlight that principals must model inclusive practices and build infrastructures supporting bilingual families. This includes establishing parent advisory councils with bilingual representatives, organizing community feedback forums to identify specific challenges, and partnering with local organizations to provide childcare or transportation during school events. Embedding these supports into school culture creates equitable opportunities for all families to engage meaningfully in their children’s education.
Evidence of Impact
Research consistently highlights the multifaceted benefits of parental engagement across academic, social, and emotional domains. Increased parental involvement correlates with higher student attendance rates, improved academic performance in core subjects, and enhanced social-emotional development, including stronger self-confidence and better peer relationships (Cyr et al., 2022). Schools implementing inclusive parental engagement often experience a ripple effect; teachers report higher levels of motivation and professional satisfaction due to strengthened collaboration with families, leading to more tailored and effective instructional strategies (Henderson & Mapp, 2002).
Empirical evidence underscores the transformative potential of co-created educational experiences. For instance, the Digital Home program demonstrated that when parents receive digital literacy training and tools to navigate school systems, they become more confident in advocating for their children’s needs. This empowerment enhances parental engagement and contributes to broader school improvement initiatives, such as developing culturally relevant curricula or creating equitable access to resources (Gross et al., 2020). Longitudinal studies reveal that such programs foster sustained increases in family participation in decision-making processes, highlighting their long-term impact on school-community relationships.
Conclusion
Amplifying the voices of bilingual families is not merely an act of inclusion but a critical strategy for fostering equitable, dynamic, and culturally responsive educational environments. Schools can create partnerships that benefit all stakeholders by reframing parental engagement to emphasize shared responsibility, leveraging social capital to build trust and access resources, and addressing systemic barriers intentionally. These efforts enhance students’ academic outcomes and build stronger, more resilient school communities where every family’s contributions are valued. Institutionalizing these practices and ensuring they adapt to the evolving needs of diverse communities remains a significant challenge. Educators and leaders must commit to embedding these inclusive strategies into school policies and practices to realize their transformative potential.
References
Bazron, B., Osher, D., & Fleischman, S. (2005). Creating culturally responsive schools. American Educator, 11(1), 38-47.
Beausaert, S., Froehlich, D. E., Riley, P., & Gallant, A. (2023). What about school principals’ well-being? The role of social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 405-421.
Behtoui, A., & Strömberg, I. (2020). Compensatory school effects and social capital. Social Sciences, 9(11), 193.
Bourdieu, P. (2018). The forms of capital. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 78-92). Routledge.
Bourke, R. (2023). Responding to complexity in disadvantaged school contexts: the role of school networks in building social capital. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 1043-1064.
Cyr, D., Weiner, J., & Woulfin, S. (2022). Logics and the orbit of parent engagement. School Community Journal, 32(1), 9-38.
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., … & Williams, K. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Corwin Press.
Gross, D., Bettencourt, A. F., Taylor, K., Francis, L., Bower, K., & Singleton, D. L. (2020). What is parent engagement in early learning? Depends who you ask. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 747-760.
Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Annual Synthesis, 2002.
McKenna, M. K., & Millen, J. (2013). Look! Listen! Learn! Parent Narratives and Grounded Theory Models of Parent Voice, Presence, and Engagement in K-12 Education. School Community Journal, 23(1), 9-48.
Platt, D. (2012). Understanding parental engagement with child welfare services: An integrated model. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 138-148.
Spear, S., Spotswood, F., Goodall, J., & Warren, S. (2022). Reimagining parental engagement in special schools–a practice theoretical approach. Educational Review, 74(7), 1243-1263.
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race ethnicity and education, 8(1), 69-91.